Favored dermal contact with the surroundings, inhospitable though it was, to the loss of sensation s

Garments." 124

96.

member of the animal kingdom. People are the only species to clothe themselves.

97.

Critters.

Fred Ilfeld and Roger Lauer write: "Mankind's important goal is superiority . . . and one manner he strives for it's

through clothing. Not only do clothing protect and decorate, however they also grant standing to the wearer, not simply with

Regard to peers but, more importantly, in relation to man's place in nature. Clothes make a human being appear less

like an animal and more like a god by concealing his sexual organs." 125 Lawrence Langner includes: "Modern man is a

puritan and not a pagan, and by his clothes has been able to beat his feeling of shame in regard to his sex

organs in public, in mixed company. https://transtats.bts.gov/exit.asp?url=https://nudeace.com 's done this by transforming his fundamental inferiority into a sense of

superiority, by linking himself to God in whose sexless picture he asserts to be made. But bring all his clothes away, and

It's plain to see he is half-god, half-creature. He's playing two opposing parts which contradict one another, and

the result is confusion." 126

98. The physical barrier of clothing fortifies mental barriers dividing us from the natural world.

In our clothing-obsessed society, we have distanced ourselves so much from nature that the sight of our

own natural state is often startling. Allen Ginsberg writes: "Truth may consistently surprise a little, because we are

creatures of habit, notably in our hypermechanized, hyperindustrialized, hypermilitarized society. Any

Demo of nature tends to appear shocking." 127

99.

may be emotional damaging.

Robert Bahr writes: "Nakedness is the natural state of mankind; clothes demands a barrier between us

and God, nature, the universe, which functions to dehumanize us all." 128 "Paradoxically," muses Jeremy Seabrook,

everyday lives. After all, whole sectors are now dedicated to empowering folks 'to get away from it all.' What is it,

Exactly, they want to get away from, when the iconography of their culture is marketed internationally as the supplier of

everything? Many will declare they're trying to find something not available at home (apart from sun), something

They've been stripped of their cultural heritage; and this is

why they have to buy back what ought to be the birthright of all human beings: safe anchorage in celebrations and

rituals that attend the significant moments of our human lives." 129

100. As an example, the the alternative of going bare

during hot, humid weather considerably reduces the need for air conditioning. Most air conditioners use tremendous

101. Garments is produced by environmentally reckless procedures from environmentally irresponsible

sources.

For http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/help/urlstatusgo.html?url=https://nudismhq.com , synthetics are developed from oil; and cotton is grown with intensive pesticide-loaded

agricultural techniques. Cotton constitutes half of the world's textile consumption, and is one of the most pesticidesprayed

crops in the world. Garments manufacture might additionally include chlorine bleaching, chemical dyeing, sealing

with metallic compounds, finishing with resins and formaldehyde, and electroplating to rust-proof zippers, creating

Poisonous deposits in waste water.130

Accepted clothing conditions are arbitrary and inconsistent.

102. Clothes standards are inconsistent.

For example, a bikini covering is accepted and even lauded on the beach, but is confined elsewhere--in a

department store, for example. Even on the shore, an expensive bikini is considered okay, w here as panties-

-though it covers the same amount--is not.

103. Clothing conditions are arbitrarily and irrationally based on sex.131

Until the 1920s, for instance, female ankles and shins were considered erotic in Western cultures, though

men wore knickers. The Japanese considered the back of a woman's neck erotic, and modern Middle Eastern

cultures conceal the girl's face. During the 1991 Gulf War, female U.S. army staff were prohibited from

wearing t-shirts that bared their arms, as it would offend the Saudi Arabian allies. Women (but not men) were

forced to wear full army dress in stifling heat.132

104. Today in The United States, women's breasts are seen as sexual and unexposable, even though they are

anatomically identical to all those of guys except for lactation capacity, and no more or less a sexual organ.